On Rape, Roman and Ridiculousness

I wasn’t the girl who walked out of the bedroom after being raped, dazed and confused, shoving toilet paper in the crotch of my underwear and wondering how I would put the pieces back together. I got raped, I accepted it. It didn’t scar me or redefine my life or demeanour and it definitely didn’t ruin me any more than had already been done.

But I’m one of the rare few and I’m conscious of it. I feel badly about the people who had a hard time, a terrible time, the ones who still dream, feel like they’re suffering it again and again. The people who shrink away from a touch, who can seemingly never fully trust another person who might have that power again.

Logically, I understand it; emotionally, I don’t.

I can watch episodes of Law and Order: Special Victims Unit without flinching. I think it’s something wrong in the wiring of my brain.

Anyway.

The recent events surrounding Roman Polanski’s arrest, Whoopi Goldberg’s comments on The View and all of the Free Roman spectators and support has pissed me the fuck off. He, a director, actor, writer had something really shitty happen to him in the form of his wife’s murder. He grew up in the ghetto in Poland, his father was put to work in a camp during World War II and for all I know, my great-grandfather might have been one of the fucking assholes responsible for his mother’s death in Auschwitz.

He’s had a hard row to sow, so to speak.

That doesn’t excuse anything.

The fact that anyone would support his want for freedom from prosecution makes them also a fucking asshole to me – I don’t care if he’s a genius or whatever. There is no way, ever in my lifetime, that I will consider sex between a 13-year old and a 44-year old okay.

Even if it’s consensual. Because there’s no such thing with such a large age gap, especially with such a child. Because there’s such things as trust, power and position of authority – all of which the 44-year old had in this situation.

Even if she showed up at his hotel, car, home, film set or the bar’s bathroom, slipped herself a roofie after downing half a bottle of champagne and said “Daddy, I’ve been a bad girl.”

Even if she’d already slept with half the football team, blown all of the chess club and was hooking for meth.

There’s no way it’s okay for a 44-year old man to have sex with a 13-year old girl.

There’s no way that isn’t rape, and there’s no way that that act – the one that involved oral, anal and vaginal sex – being called rape-rape or sex with a minor, will ever be justified.

There’s just no way.

If my daughter were to come home, tell me that someone had given her booze and drugs and then had forcible sex with all of her major orifices while she said no, I wouldn’t stop to consider the individual’s career – I would be out for blood. Regardless of whether she was 13 or 19 or 29 or 40, and he was 13 or 19 or 29 or 44 or 62.

I wouldn’t have allowed that person to go about the world for two decades having served less than half of his plea bargain and I sure as hell wouldn’t understand anyone enraged by his arrest after fleeing his punishment. In fact, I don’t know that I would be able to accept a plea bargain in the first place and the likelihood of me scouting for assassins would be high.

Sometimes, people just disgust me.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • I couldn't agree more. Wrong is wrong.
  • Hi, this actually a crime. Having sex with an under age girl is definitely against the law.. This is actually considered as a rape and I agree with that.. So this man must be imprisoned and pay his sin. He is a crime commiter. I thank you for letting me read about it. This really made my nerves wrecked. Thanks.
  • fucking-A Terra... this Roman Polanski thing makes me so sick. they have protests in France for this asshole? HE RAPED a 13 year old girl.
  • Amen, dear girl. xo
  • THANK YOU! I agree completely. A 13-year-old is a child, in the eyes of the law and in every other way. No matter what that CHILD does, it is up to the adult in the situation to be the adult. There is something wrong with a 44-year-old who looks at a 13-year-old as someone who can be an equal sex partner, instead of as a little girl who is definitely off limits.
  • Oh, ack. This whole story has always hurt my head... it's just disgusting. She was a child. She said NO. What the fuck is the problem here? He should have gone to jail the moment she pointed her little finger at him as the pervy-perp. And the very fact that someone like Woody Allen is standing up in his defense is more than a little bit sick in the nubile-love department. Yuck. I mean, GAWD!!
  • Yes, definitely, any support coming from Woody Allen where the concern is sex with a child isn't support at all.
  • ali
    she said NO. end of story.

    I don't care what the hell Whoopi Goldberg or any other celebrity says...it WAS rape-rape.
  • Exactamundo.
  • I felt bad for those rape victims who in my opinion don't really deserve to be treated that way.
  • I'm sorry, but do you think that you can clarify for me which rape victims might, in your opinion, deserve to be treated that way?

    Please tell me that you phrased that so awkwardly, you don't realize what you've accidentally and completely unintentionally insinuated.
  • amen!
  • katie
    Thank you for writing this, you said it perfectly. My mind is blown that some people are dismissing this, calling it something else, or should I say nothing else. I guess my mind isn't really blown, it's just really, really disappointed.
  • Yes, disappointed is exactly my sentiments.
  • Thank you, thank you, thank you! I was yelling at my tv when they replayed the Whoopi bit. "Just because it's not nails, teeth,screaming and fighting doesn't mean it isn't rape rape, Whoopi!" He's a fucking grown man, who gave a 13 year old girl booze and drugs until she couldn't MOVE, and even after she said NO he still RAPED her! Having horrible things happen in your past should in no way excuse horrible behaviour.

    Thank you for being brave and vocal enough to write this post.
  • Amen! Hallelujah! Preach it sister!

    Also, the whole thing makes me wonder about how much other crap he has possibly gotten away with. Arrrgh!
  • I don't want to know, really.
  • If he were not "Roman Polanski The Director" and was just Roman Polanski the "everyday man"... no one would have hesitated to throw him in prison, where the other hardened men in prison would punish him for his crimes against a child.

    It is only because he is "famous" that he has been allowed to escape the punishment he deserves. Sadly that is a reflection on society, and how it generally elevates people of "fame" above the laws the "everyday" citizens have to live by.
  • I think it ironic that Polanski was apparently most concerned with having to serve a longer sentence than his original plea bargain allowed for. When the reality is that the likelihood of him being abused, raped, beat down and potentially even killed in prison should have been a much more terrifying notion to him.
  • Well said lady. WELL SAID.
blog comments powered by Disqus